Home | BaltimoreBrew.com

Homelessness and Housing

Commentaryby Jeff Singer11:45 amDec 15, 20170

Holiday Wish Part 1: That Baltimore’s leaders tell the truth about the homeless crisis

The mayor and the media are misrepresenting the number of residents in dire need of shelter, a longtime activist says

Above: On Bath Street near the Baltimore Sun’s offices, men sleep in the roadway earlier this week. (Fern Shen)

There it was at the top of an editorial in the Baltimore Sun: “Advocates estimate that on any given night some 2,600 people are sleeping on the streets,” the newspaper wrote.

Wrong.

The advocates, if there is such a group, find this number to be both inaccurate (far too low if referring to the number of people experiencing homelessness) and not useful.

It’s a city and federal government number, the result of the annual “point-in-time” count of people experiencing homelessness during a limited time in January. (The 2017 count in Baltimore yielded the number 2,669, to be exact.)

Never mind that it’s too low for a one-night count – probably 30% to 40% too low, national research indicates. The real number is magnitudes higher, perhaps 30 times higher. I’ll explain why in a moment.

But here’s why the use of that “2,600” is important. It permits the conclusion that the public sector doesn’t bear responsibility for homelessness and that, while the problem is costly, the private and philanthropic sectors could, with a little push, solve it.

That’s precisely how Mayor Catherine Pugh used the number.

Rounding up to 3,000 – and extrapolating from a $35 million project being developed by the Helping Up Mission for 300 people – she came up with a $350 million price tag for “solving” the homeless problem.

Catherine Pugh with Helping Up Mission deputy director Gary Byers, at Sec. Carson's visit. (Fern Shen)

Catherine Pugh with Helping Up Mission Deputy Director Gary Byers during a recent visit by HUD Secretary Ben Carson. (Fern Shen)

It’s hard to say what inspired the mayor to make an assumption about the issue based on Helping Up Mission’s “transitional shelter” project – an anachronistic model for ending homelessness that even the federal government no longer supports.

The Sun said the idea came from Pugh’s Mayoral Workgroup on Homelessness, explaining that the panel’s report “included a suggested price tag for the effort totaling some $350 million that the mayor says she’ll try to raise from the business and philanthropic communities.”

I couldn’t find such a notion anywhere in the group’s 27-page report.

92,000 Cannot Afford Rent

With winter upon us and temperatures now dropping, tents are proliferating around the city – many within blocks of City Hall.

Other people are literally sleeping on downtown streets, under I-83 or in front of the Health Care for the Homeless building.

What can Mayor Pugh, the Mayor’s Office of Human Services, the City Council and media pundits do?

For starters, they must acknowledge the real magnitude of the problem.

The true number of people experiencing homelessness each year in Baltimore is between 15,000 and 30,000. And the number of people who are inadequately housed and at risk of homelessness is at least 92,000 households.

This estimate comes from the government itself – specifically from Baltimore Housing.

According to the agency’s “Consolidated Plan 2015-2020,” out of the 238,959 households in Baltimore, 92,186 of them – or 38.6% – are “cost-burdened,” meaning that they cannot afford their rent every month.

Another gauge of the problem is evictions.

Every year in Baltimore City, 6,000 to 7,000 renter households are evicted by the courts for not paying the rent, according to a report by the Abell Foundation and the Public Justice Center, “Justice Diverted: How Renters are Processed in Baltimore City’s Rent Court.”

These evictions result from a court system, known colloquially as “the Rent Court,” overwhelmed by landlord litigation, to the tune of 150,000 rent cases annually, the 2015 report says.

The authors call on court and city officials to increase renters’ access to legal information, require better landlord documentation of rent claims, expand landlord licensing requirements, and fund eviction prevention programs.

Although useful in and of themselves, these procedural reforms only underscore what is the bigger structural problem confronting one out of  three Baltimore residents – the unaffordability of current market-rate housing.

• Holiday Wish Part 2: That Baltimore’s leaders actually lead
___________________________________
Jeff Singer has been working on homelessness issues in Baltimore for more than 40 years, first at the Department of Social Services and then at Health Care for the Homeless, where he was president and CEO between 1998 and 2011. He now teaches at the University of Maryland School of Social Work and can be reached at  jeff.singer@ssw.umaryland.edu.

Most Popular